ABVX Bets on a Re-Rating of a New Ulcerative Colitis Drug

▲ 10💬 12
Original Post
Show original post

I haven't posted on here in a long time, simply haven't had many insanely good ideas that aren't linked to the AI trade pop on my radar until this one.

A couple of weeks ago, I had the chance to have coffee with a hedge fund manager who's big on Biopharma. She was telling me about some challenges big pharma's facing over the next few years and the potential for some massive gains in the space buying labs that own interesting patents.

Essentially, in biotech, you have 2 sides. You have the labs that do the research on medicines and you have Big Pharma that buys the rights to sell medications when when labs find something patent worthy that's worth their time.

Big Pharma doesn't bother doing research as much anymore unless they're certain they'll have a blockbuster drug. It's not worth the risk for their shareholders, so what they do instead is wait for a lab to discover something of note and do all the testing, then either buy out the lab or lease the right to sell the medication with a royalty agreement. They then have their sales teams go out into the world to sell the medication and they use their factories to produce large quantities of these meds for sale.
Big Pharma takes minimal risk on research and instead takes the risk on sales.

Between now and 2030, $400 billion of annual sales worth of products are falling off patent. When that happens, big pharma's set to lose out on MASSIVE revenues as generics will be allowed to compete.

They need to replace those patents with new products that can move the needle.

There's only 2 ways they can realistically save themselves from the patent cliff:

  1. Do research on their existing products they own the rights to so they can find out whether these medications can be used for new uses and then file a new patent (Think Ozempic. It was patented for diabetes, then they found out it works for weight loss, so a new patent was filed).
  2. They can find new products to sell. (Which means either M&A with labs or sign royalty deals).

In comes Abivax $ABVX. Abivax is a European lab that has a patent on a medication (Obefazimod) that was initially developped for use to treat HIV as an antiviral.

In their research, they discovered that it had amazing results in treating Ulcerative Colitis.

Current treatments have 15-35% success rates initially (25-50% long-term symptom control).

Obefazimod has over 50% remission rates (40% more than the placebo).

Out of patients who showed zero response to standard initial induction therapy, 37.2% achieved clinical remission after continuing on a 50 mg dose of Obefazimod and patients who had seen a relapse, increasing the dose to 50 mg saw 45% of them to completely regain clinical remission.

Analysts are expecting this medication to be worth between $3.5-4 billion for for Ulcerative Colitis alone.

The lab is currently testing for Crohn's disease as well. If they get approval there, it's another $3-4 billion of annual sales potential.

The medication's a once a day pill, which makes it extremely convenient.

They plan to file with the FDA by end of year.
The expectations are that they'll be bought out before then.

If they don't, that would mean that they'll become a cashflow monster.

Why didn't I post a couple of weeks ago when the stock was at 100$?
The stock sold off a few weeks ago on a report that there were a few patients that had developed various cancers. This cancer risk made the company less likely to be acquired until more testing could be done.
Follow-on data has just come out and it looks like they're in the clear.

70% of the float's owned by institutions, so there's a low float.
This leaves us big opportunity for an early pop.

TLDR: High likelihood of acquisition due to patent cliff. Probably a 2-3 bagger. Buy long-dated calls.

How you should position yourself: Acquisitions take time and are generally surprise announcements in pharma. Being that the FDA approval is aimed for end of year and expectations are that the company is bought out before then, long-dated calls are the play.
I think the stock will slowly rise through end of year which will offset some of the IV crush.

Positions in the screenshot below.

Processing img b8rbj9ygaxah1...

Affected Tickers
ABVX
Post Analysis Summary

The target discussed by the poster is Abivax (ABVX), a clinical-stage biotech company listed in France/the U.S., whose core asset is once-daily oral obefazimod. The investment thesis rests on two levels: first, large pharmaceutical companies face a patent cliff over the next few years and need to replenish pipelines through M&A or licensing; second, ABVX's obefazimod has strong late-stage clinical data in ulcerative colitis (UC), and recent cancer safety concerns have been eased by newly added data, so it may once again become an acquisition target. The poster says that by 2030, drugs with about $400 billion in annual sales will face loss of patent protection, and Big Pharma needs external assets to replace revenue; as a small biotech company with patents on a potential blockbuster drug, ABVX may benefit from this industry backdrop. At the drug level, the poster emphasizes that obefazimod was initially developed as an HIV antiviral, but was later found to have significant effects in UC; compared with current treatments' early control rates of 15%-35% and long-term control rates of 25%-50%, obefazimod achieved a clinical remission rate above 50% in maintenance therapy, about 40 percentage points higher than placebo, and also showed good rescue effects in initial induction non-responders and relapsed patients. For example, after continuing 50mg treatment, 37.2% of induction non-responders achieved clinical remission, and after relapsed patients were increased to 50mg, about 45% regained clinical remission. The poster further cites market expectations, saying that peak sales for the UC indication alone may be $3.5-$4.0 billion, and if Crohn’s disease is approved, that would add another $3-$4 billion in annual sales potential. The company plans to submit an NDA to the FDA by the end of 2026, and the poster believes the market expectation is that it will be acquired before submission; if it is not acquired, it could also become a high-cash-flow company after successful commercialization. On the trading side, the poster says the stock was around $100 a few weeks ago, but fell after some patients had cancer reports, reducing the near-term probability of M&A; subsequently, the company disclosed follow-up data showing that the incidence of malignancies was consistent with the UC background rate, which the poster believes removed the safety overhang. The conclusion is that ABVX could achieve a 2-3x move by year-end, and the poster recommends using long-dated calls to capture the uncertain timing of a pharmaceutical acquisition announcement, while also believing that the stock price will rise slowly enough to offset part of the IV crush. An important gap is that the post equates 'safety data easing concerns' with 'high-probability M&A,' a leap that lacks direct evidence; the acquisition price, timing, and buyer are all only inferences. The current share price has already risen significantly from $100, and comments also note that another 2-3x move from the current price is more difficult. Another risk is that ABVX still mainly depends on a single core asset, the NDA has not yet been submitted, and FDA review, labeling, safety interpretation, commercialization capability, and competition from rival oral drugs and biologics will all affect valuation. The post says there was a position screenshot, but this scrape did not provide an image attachment, and the preview image in the comments also suggests it may have been deleted, so the poster's actual options position, expiration dates, strike prices, or capital size cannot be verified.

Discussion Summary

The comment sample is very small, and most comments mock biotech speculation and 'drinking coffee while listening to fund managers.' Some people questioned whether this was an institutional account pumping the stock; OP responded that their account is 9 years old with relatively high karma and is not a new account. The more substantive rebuttal was that ABVX has already rallied from the $80-$100 range, so achieving another 2-3x from the current price will not be easy, although the company itself is good and still has upside. Another comment noted that the position screenshot claimed by the poster can no longer be displayed.

Fact Check
supported
obefazimod's Phase 3 UC maintenance therapy data showed that both 25mg and 50mg met the primary endpoint, with clinical remission rates of about 50%, roughly 40 percentage points higher than placebo.
Abivax's June 1, 2026 announcement stated that the 25mg and 50mg once-daily doses achieved Week 44 clinical remission rates of 50.8% and 51.3%, respectively, versus 10.4% for placebo, with placebo-adjusted differences of 39.3 and 40.3 percentage points, respectively.
supported
After induction non-responders continued 50mg obefazimod, 37.2% achieved clinical remission, and about 45% of relapsed patients regained clinical remission after being increased to 50mg.
The ABTECT Maintenance Part 2 data announced by Abivax on June 29, 2026 showed a Week 44 clinical remission rate of 37.2% among induction non-responders in the 50mg group; for relapsed patients who switched to or escalated to 50mg, the clinical remission rate was 45.0%-45.5%.
supported
Recent follow-up safety data eased concerns about cancer risk, with the incidence of malignancies consistent with the UC background level.
In the integrated Phase 2/3 UC data disclosed by the company, the exposure-adjusted incidence rates of malignancies other than non-melanoma skin cancer and of NMSC were described as being consistent with the expected UC background range; however, this is the company's characterization and still needs confirmation through FDA review.
supported
Abivax plans to submit an NDA to the FDA by the end of 2026 for obefazimod in UC.
Multiple Abivax company announcements state that it plans to submit an NDA for the UC indication in Q4 2026 or by the end of 2026.
supported
Around 2030, roughly $400 billion in annual sales at large pharmaceutical companies will face a patent cliff.
Industry sources vary in methodology, with common estimates suggesting that about $236-$400 billion or $300-$400 billion in annual branded-drug sales will be at risk during 2025-2030; the poster is using the high end of the range.
questionable
Analysts expect obefazimod's value or peak sales in UC to be about $3.5-$4.0 billion.
Some analyst models do provide peak sales forecasts near or above $4 billion, but public reports also sometimes use $4 billion for IBD in total, or provide lower-range estimates; the poster's claim of '$3.5-$4.0 billion for UC alone' is optimistic but not entirely without basis.
unclear
About 70% of ABVX's float is held by institutions, so the low float is easy to push up early.
Some third-party data sources show institutional ownership of about 70%, but different data providers vary significantly in their treatment of ADRs, ordinary shares, float, and 13F disclosures, and some sources give a markedly lower institutional percentage; 'therefore it will be pushed up early' is a trading inference that cannot be directly verified.

Loading Truth Social...

Loading live updates...

Settings
Appearance
Card Style
Language
Live View Style
News Sources
AI Summary for Long Articles
News Filter
Duplicate News Aggregation
Recency
Trump Truth Social
About Us
Version 2.6.1
Data Source r/wallstreetbets
AI Engine ChatGPT/Gemini/Claude
MCP Server https://mcp.sellthenews.org/mcp